Re: huge shared_blocks_hit one select but manually run very fast

From: David Mullineux <dmullx(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: James Pang <jamespang886(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: huge shared_blocks_hit one select but manually run very fast
Date: 2024-12-21 16:40:54
Message-ID: CAGsyd8U0cgD=2wTG5HAsbs=e=9ynz3r55tH56xzQeUQYju94Yw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Depends on a lot of thongs...Visibility map sounds like it's impacted here.
Are your inserts towards the index (like a monotonically increasing serial
id) or scattered around the index values ? How big is the table index
and shared buffers ? An example would really help

On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, 11:51 James Pang, <jamespang886(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
> we have a simple select .... from table where ... (that mache the
> index) , table has 80million rows. when many application sessions run the
> query and at the same time some other sessions doing insert into ... this
> table. from pg_stat_statements, shared_blks_hit show 31652 / per call. we
> see very high cpu almost 100% cpu during application workload test, and
> high LWLock BufferMapping waiting for these querys. But manually run the
> sql show only 2148 shared_blks_hit/ per call. this is a simple sql, from
> pg_profile we did see it use same index scan as manually running. What
> could be possible reason leading so big difference with shared_blks_hit ?
> PGv14.8
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Pang 2024-12-22 03:38:37 Re: huge shared_blocks_hit one select but manually run very fast
Previous Message James Pang 2024-12-21 11:50:40 huge shared_blocks_hit one select but manually run very fast