From: | bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> |
Cc: | Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Backups over slave instead master? |
Date: | 2014-05-01 19:39:44 |
Message-ID: | CAGrpgQ9KmwZkbhxnoNYmEP7tQNGYw1b1ioSGsosQr04PYi3kDg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 10:31 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if would be possible to execute these backups in the slave
>> server instead, so I can avoid the overhead of backups on master system?
>>
>
> If you're on PostgreSQL 9.3, you can backup the slave server safely. If
> not, you'll need to run this command on the master system first:
>
> SELECT pg_start_backup('some-label');
>
> After the backup is done, run this on the master server:
>
> SELECT pg_stop_backup();
>
Or alternatively, if "backup" = pg_dump, then backups can taken from the
slave too. Have a look at pg_xlog_replay_pause() + pg_dump +
pg_xlog_replay_resume().
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-RECOVERY-CONTROL-TABLE
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Fabel | 2014-05-01 19:46:05 | Re: Ubuntu Packages / Config Files |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2014-05-01 19:35:17 | Re: Ubuntu Packages / Config Files |