Re: pg_restore PostgreSQL 9.3.3 problems

From: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Burgess, Freddie" <FBurgess(at)radiantblue(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore PostgreSQL 9.3.3 problems
Date: 2014-06-12 21:08:14
Message-ID: CAGrpgQ98+Yj6N4YXpbMLsSDwjUef-4QXePofsj7hti75sr_AhQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Burgess, Freddie <FBurgess(at)radiantblue(dot)com>
wrote:

> *pg_restore -c -F c -j 3 -U postgres -d trackdb -v
> "trackdb.partial.dmp"*
>
> Error Condition:
>
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 575; 1259 618063 TABLE
> tracker_message postgres
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: cannot drop
> table tracker_message because other objects depend on it
> DETAIL: constraint tracker_event_message_id_fkey on table
> tracker_event_message_underflow depends on table tracker_message
> constraint tracker_event_message_id_fkey on table
> tracker_event_message_y2010m01 depends on table tracker_message.
>

Does it make a difference if you omit the "-j3" parallel option on restore?

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-06-13 00:23:49 Re: BUG #10611: pg_restore incorrectly restores DB dump (plain and tar format) containing LARGE OBJECTS witdh commen
Previous Message Burgess, Freddie 2014-06-12 20:25:20 pg_restore PostgreSQL 9.3.3 problems