From: | bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Inspect values of prepared statements |
Date: | 2016-05-02 23:17:51 |
Message-ID: | CAGrpgQ8swe5pG87jqumXaWgF30tJGNkYfsg4WM=U7DqDziA6Nw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> What I think we could do without too much trouble or overhead is to set
> up errcontext data so that a failure like that could come with a CONTEXT
> line like
>
> ERROR: invalid input syntax for type double precision: "A"
> STATEMENT: insert into x (a,b,c,d,e,f) VALUES ($1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$6)
> CONTEXT: reading parameter $2 for statement "foo"
>
> I'm curious whether that would be enough information to solve your
> problem.
>
I ran into this same problem a couple weeks ago, your suggestion above
would have supplied enough information to debug the invalid input without
having to jump through hoops at the application side.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-03 00:13:57 | Re: Inspect values of prepared statements |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-02 21:40:59 | Re: Inspect values of prepared statements |