Re: Reply: Can we specify transaction level

From: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: guxiaobo1982 <guxiaobo1982(at)qq(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reply: Can we specify transaction level
Date: 2013-07-20 02:05:02
Message-ID: CAGrpgQ8c1BvQ5zbssU=dt0ta7bJXV1YBVOMiZ-nLaWfjEo25qg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, guxiaobo1982 <guxiaobo1982(at)qq(dot)com> wrote:

>
> what does a wrapper function mean, count is a standard function in Greenplum, or how to creat the wrapper function.
>
> regards
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:47 AM, guxiaobo1982 <guxiaobo1982(at)qq(dot)com> wrote:
>
> There is another situation,
>
>
> We have a demo table with about 17000000 rows, the "select count(1) from demotable" statement finishes with-in 3 seconds when executed directlly against the Greenplum database,but it takes about 230 seconds to finish when executed via postgres_fdw inside PostgreSQL 9.3 beta2, I guess that it may because of postgres_fdw pulling data to the PostgreSQL instance and counts the rows there, but I think the query optimizer should pass through the count() function to the Greenplum end, and gets only the result back.
>
>
> Are you able to create a function in Greenplum which is a wrapper around that count(*) and call that via the postgres_fdw?
>

Create a function in Greenplum like (untested, I don't have Greenplum)

create table custom_count() returns bigint as $$
select count(*) as total from yourtable;
$$ language sql;

Then from your pg db using postgres_fdw select * from that function (which
resides in Greenplum).

No idea if that'll work or make a difference though.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message guxiaobo1982 2013-07-20 02:18:29 Reply: Can we specify transaction level
Previous Message guxiaobo1982 2013-07-20 00:08:25 Reply: Can we specify transaction level