From: | bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: OLAP |
Date: | 2013-08-28 03:53:06 |
Message-ID: | CAGrpgQ--_eX3u=gHLaGMM2DiWKsRc=SGQu-1RggxWkFXY3Oxow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>wrote:
> Vertica is another case of an analytics focused platform that dirived
> from Postgres, version 8.0 IIRC.
>
FWIW,
You might be thinking of Greenplum, and I think it forked from pg 8.1.
Vertica was built from scratch, it is not using Postgres as the basis for
the db. This is according to the engineers that I have spoken to in the
past at Vertica. I believe there was some code ported over for their
command line client "vsql", but I could be wrong about that. At the very
least, vsql looks and acts like psql from a user's point of view.
I agree absolutely with you about the dazzling speed of certain types of
queries -- one of my tests was a simple aggregate query (a bunch of SUM()
and GROUP BY's) over about 500M rows and it returned results in a handful
of seconds. The same query in our Postgresql server with 2x the number of
disks took handfuls of minutes IIRC. On the flip side, I found some of the
complex Window functions performed on par or better in Postgresql than in
Vertica.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-08-28 04:13:00 | Re: Is there any method to limit resource usage in PG? |
Previous Message | Jayadevan | 2013-08-28 03:50:24 | Re: OLAP |