From: | AI Rumman <rummandba(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fabio Rueda Carrascosa <avances123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade link mode |
Date: | 2013-05-16 18:21:16 |
Message-ID: | CAGoODpcCmzNfvzRd17a6a4u0F+xYa_6JceVDOBivjzj0bBAcsA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I told you I would never go for a production with link mode. However, I was
working with pg_upgrade copy mode and in the middle I got an error saying
missing some extensions. I rollback and start the operation after setting
everything up.
I don't know how it will behave in link mode if you fail in the middle.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com> wrote:
>
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:
> pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of AI Rumman
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:56 PM
> To: Fabio Rueda Carrascosa
> Cc: pgsql-general
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade link mode
>
> I always think its a bit risky to use link instead of copying. However,
> I'd suggest to try the --check at first of pg_upgrade.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Why?
> Do you have specific experience, when link mode caused any problems?
> Could you share?
>
> Regards,
> Igor Neyman
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lonni J Friedman | 2013-05-16 18:23:27 | Re: pg_upgrade link mode |
Previous Message | Oscar Calderon | 2013-05-16 18:19:41 | About replacing PostgreSQL instance |