| From: | wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TOAST versus toast |
| Date: | 2025-04-13 11:37:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAGjGUA+aPxvyW1a7bzpqTD0EUaLRfTYNqR+wWNt5DjvpUcZ1hg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi，
I think this point is of no significance at all. Besides, this is a
document that has been around for over ten years. Everyone has become
accustomed to this kind of expression. This is just a case of being full
but having nothing to do with anything.
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 10:31, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 8:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your suggestions. At this point option (1) is looking most
>> attractive. Probably, I will just withdraw the CF entry soon unless
>> there is some new interest. Just chipping away fixing a few places
>> isn't going to achieve the consistency this thread was aiming for.
>>
>>
> I've moved this back to waiting on author pending a final decision.
> Interested parties might still chime in but it doesn't seem like it is
> actively looking for reviewers at this point.
>
> David J.
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-04-13 12:12:05 | Re: remove unnecessary explicit type conversion (to char) for appendStringInfoChar function calls |
| Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2025-04-13 11:01:56 | Call for Posters: PGConf.dev 2025 |