| From: | Koen De Groote <kdg(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How does postgres behave if several indexes have (nearly) identical conditions? |
| Date: | 2021-09-08 21:41:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAGbX52Fb1owDbjm53X6hr425XMWjopV6YoqzeyTi21mCJRuYjQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
And initial setup is wrong. There should be no 'and a002=false' in the
indexes.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:15 PM Koen De Groote <kdg(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Forgot to mention, this is on Postgres 11.2
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:04 PM Koen De Groote <kdg(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings all.
>>
>> Example table:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE my_table (
>> id serial PRIMARY KEY,
>> a001 BOOLEAN default 't',
>> a002 BOOLEAN default 'f',
>> a003 BOOLEAN default 't',
>> a004 BOOLEAN default 'f'
>> );
>>
>> And these 2 indexes:
>>
>> create index index_001 on my_table using btree (a001,a002,a003) where
>> a001=true and a002=false;
>>
>> create index index_002 on my_table using btree (a003) where a001=true and
>> a002=false;
>>
>> Now take this query:
>>
>> select * from my_table where a001=true;
>>
>> Which index will postgres pick? I'm wondering how postgres goes about
>> picking an index to consider.
>>
>> And if it will consider others if the analysis of the first says a
>> seqscan would be better than the index it first considered?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Koen De Groote
>>
>>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-09-08 21:53:18 | Re: How does postgres behave if several indexes have (nearly) identical conditions? |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-09-08 21:18:51 | Re: How does postgres behave if several indexes have (nearly) identical conditions? |