From: | Cory Tucker <cory(dot)tucker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Efficiently Triggering Autovacuum Analyze? |
Date: | 2015-12-30 19:09:16 |
Message-ID: | CAG_=8kBxpgJWsjspQ8WNfoRQ+QqWw4hupGh4ymDEPzUbDcmoJA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
We have a performance problem accessing one of our tables, I think because
the statistics are out of date. The table is fairly large, on the order of
100M rows or so.
The general structure of the table is as follows:
Column | Type | Modifiers
-------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------------
id | bigint | not null default nextval('foo_id_seq'::regclass)
record_id | text |
account_id | bigint | not null
With indexes:
"foo_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"uq_account_id_record_id" UNIQUE CONSTRAINT, btree (account_id,
record_id)
This table is almost always queried using a combination of (account_id,
record_id) and is generally pretty fast. However, under certain loads, the
query becomes slower and slower as time goes on. The workload that causes
this to happen is when data for a new account_id is being inserted into the
table. This will happen in rapid succession and may insert millions of
rows over the course of several hours.
The pattern that I notice when this happens is that the CPU on DB will be
pegged much higher than usual, and the query to lookup records for the
(account_id, record_id) combo will steadily rise from <1ms to more then 2
or 3 seconds over time.
The fix I have employed to restore the speed of the query after I notice it
is happening is to manually issue a VACUUM ANALYZE on the table. After the
analyze is done, the query returns to its normal speed.
I am looking for suggestions for how to tune, or perhaps automatically
detect this pattern, so that I don't have to manually intervene whenever
this happens.
Here are my autovacuum settings:
name | setting | unit
-------------------------------------+-----------+------
autovacuum | on |
autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor | 0.05 |
autovacuum_analyze_threshold | 50 |
autovacuum_freeze_max_age | 200000000 |
autovacuum_max_workers | 3 |
autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age | 400000000 |
autovacuum_naptime | 30 | s
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay | 20 | ms
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit | -1 |
autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor | 0.1 |
autovacuum_vacuum_threshold | 50 |
autovacuum_work_mem | -1 | kB
We're using 9.4.4 (RDS)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-30 19:20:55 | Re: Efficiently Triggering Autovacuum Analyze? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-30 19:07:08 | Re: cannot get stable function to use index |