On 4 April 2017 at 14:07, Johann Spies <johann(dot)spies(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Why would that be?
To answer my own question. After experimenting a lot we found that
9.6 uses a parallel seqscan that is actually a lot faster than using
the index on these large tables.
This, to us was a surprise!
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3)