Re: Logical Aggregate Functions (eg ANY())

From: Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Aggregate Functions (eg ANY())
Date: 2011-12-18 00:06:21
Message-ID: CAGYyBgie=9a3JaM9tYORVYhtwybW_Er+v+B+fY2Bof377xgkvQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/15/11, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 18:10, Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> How do I do the equivalent of an ANY() or ALL() in PG Aggregate SQL?
>
> Note that in many cases, writing an EXISTS(SELECT ...) or NOT
> EXISTS(...) subquery is faster, since the planner can often optimize
> those to a single index access -- whereas an aggregate function would
> necessarily need to walk through and evaluate all potential rows.
>

Really? The planner can't tell that, for instance, BOOL_AND (false, *)
is automatically false?

(BTW Thanks for the great responses everyone! On this and other posts
on this list)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Angelico 2011-12-18 02:53:00 Performance question: Commit or rollback?
Previous Message Robert James 2011-12-18 00:04:18 Re: CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE