| From: | Joshua White <joshua(dot)white(at)monash(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Does idle sessions will consume more cpu and ram? If yes,how to control them |
| Date: | 2018-12-20 04:01:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAGY1NO=oYwQ2rxwHEHte9ctuMTHaCJX_b4kYVKWKL3AwyeXB-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 14:35, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> čt 20. 12. 2018 v 2:41 odesílatel Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> napsal:
>
>> On 12/19/18 7:27 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> [snip]
>> > Each backend stores its own copy of the relation cache, so if you have
>> > idle connections which have been used for other work in the past then
>> > the memory of those caches is still around. Idle connections also have
>> > a CPU cost in Postgres when building snapshots for example, and their
>> > entries need to be scanned from a wider array, but usually the relation
>> > cache bloat is a wider problem.
>>
>> So it's best to kill connections that have been idle for a while?
>>
>
> sure - one hour idle connection is too old.
>
I'd also assess closing the connection from the client end once its task is
done - that would reduce the number of idle connections in the first place.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-20 04:45:20 | Re: Does idle sessions will consume more cpu and ram? If yes,how to control them |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-12-20 03:34:16 | Re: Does idle sessions will consume more cpu and ram? If yes,how to control them |