Re: multiple missing providers from pgdg-common

From: Joseph G <joseph(dot)glenn(at)mytecknet(dot)com>
To: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multiple missing providers from pgdg-common
Date: 2024-01-15 19:22:27
Message-ID: CAGX+g7r6togG38xeckso_-vVEKvfO-Mw2qYA7+wq4f0rJPsubQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I can confirm everything works now, Thank you!

Sent via mobile, please excuse typos and brevity.

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024, 02:20 Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2024-01-13 at 13:23 -0800, Joseph G wrote:
> > If we look, gdal35 or 36 is asking for libarmadillo.so.10 which
> > doesn't look like its available for EL8 just an older EL7? I can't
> > get past this error at the moment.
>
> Pushed GDAL 3.6.4-6 RPMS to the repos built against armadillo 12 for
> RHEL 9, 8 and Fedora.
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Devrim Gündüz
> Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2024-01-15 19:43:20 Re: Moving to Postgresql database
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2024-01-15 19:17:23 Re: data migration using EXTENSION tds_fdw