From: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Choosing between Intel 320, Intel 510 or OCZ Vertex 3 SSD for db server |
Date: | 2011-10-25 14:55:02 |
Message-ID: | CAGTBQpbqKtn49KzV0GKOvJ63bjv9s+fg1J6Mfs1AyFZncunrEg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:37 PM, David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> wrote:
>> What about redundancy?
>>
>> How do you swap an about-to-die SSD?
>>
>> Software RAID-1?
>
> The approach we take is that we use 710 series devices which have predicted
> reliability similar to all the other components in the machine, therefore
> the unit of replacement is the entire machine. We don't use trays for
> example (which saves quite a bit on data center space). If I were running
> short endurance devices such as 320 series I would be interested in
> replacing the drives before the machine itself is likely to fail, but I'd do
> so by migrating the data and load to another machine for the replacement to
> be done offline. Note that there are other operations procedures that need
> to be done and can not be done without downtime (e.g. OS upgrade), so some
> kind of plan to deliver service while a single machine is down for a while
> will be needed regardless of the storage device situation.
Interesting.
But what about unexpected failures. Faulty electronics, stuff like that?
I really don't think a production server can work without at least raid-1.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Boreham | 2011-10-25 15:00:38 | Re: Choosing between Intel 320, Intel 510 or OCZ Vertex 3 SSD for db server |
Previous Message | alan | 2011-10-25 14:12:55 | how to use explain analyze |