Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views
Date: 2018-02-22 11:27:11
Message-ID: CAGTBQpbiB1XS2Q9yQQJzZex_HSfMq8FTf3oywx8KO+MazLv60w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2018-02-21 10:08:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yeah, that does look suspiciously like a set of facts matching this
>>> problem :-(
>
>> I'd personally say ;), given that it's one less potentially data
>> corrupting bug to worry about ;). And it's one that can be fixed without
>> dataloss to boot.
>
> I've pushed a fix for this.

Thanks for addressing this so quickly :-)

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pascal Barbedor 2018-02-22 13:38:25 bug in jsonb_set porstgresql 5.5
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2018-02-22 09:41:52 Re: BUG #15061: Cannot use TEMP TABLE ON COMMIT DROP in extension