From: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sokolov Yura <funny(dot)falcon(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Increase Vacuum ring buffer. |
Date: | 2017-07-27 17:25:26 |
Message-ID: | CAGTBQpbVFhzTSCh+-9vtewoRa=6gDS9B6wpSEGyPESk0aafxsA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Claudio Freire wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Claudio Freire wrote:
>> >
>> >> > The vacuuming the very large table with no index could also take a
>> >> > long time, and it scans and vacuums blocks one by one. So I imagined
>> >> > that we can vacuum the FSM once vacuumed a certain amount of blocks.
>> >> > And that can avoid bloating table during the long-time vacuum.
>> >>
>> >> Could do that. I'll see about doing something of the sort and
>> >> submitting it as a separate patch.
>> >
>> > Vacuuming of the FSM is in no way strictly tied to vacuuming the heap
>> > (it's not really "vacuuming", it's just about updating the upper layers
>> > to match the data in the leaves). I think we could use the new autovac
>> > "workitem" infrastructure and tack an item there once in a while for FSM
>> > vacuuming ...
>>
>> Well, it *is* tied in the sense that vacuum is the one massively
>> adding free space.
>
> Yes, but if vacuum dies after releasing lots of space but before
> vacuuming FSM, then it's not tied anymore and you could just as well run
> it anytime.
I see your point.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-07-27 17:30:53 | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2017-07-27 17:15:51 | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |