Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pavan95 <pavan(dot)postgresdba(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
Date: 2018-01-24 14:27:11
Message-ID: CAGTBQpbDRmAaiveO2bDOtXhdBJBqcgvfzmp69=XKDJ3mKcQCHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:50 AM, pavan95 <pavan(dot)postgresdba(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> One more interesting observation made by me.
>
> I have ran the below query(s) on production:
>
> SELECT
> relname,
> age(relfrozenxid) as xid_age,
> pg_size_pretty(pg_table_size(oid)) as table_size
> FROM pg_class
> WHERE relkind = 'r' and pg_table_size(oid) > 1073741824
> ORDER BY age(relfrozenxid) DESC ;
> relname |
> xid_age | table_size
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> +---------+------------
> *hxxxxxxxxxx* |
> 7798262 | 3245 MB
> hrxxxxxxxxx |
> 7797554 | 4917 MB
> irxxxxxxxxxx |
> 7796771 | 2841 MB
> hr_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 7744262 |
> 4778 MB
> reimbxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 6767712 | 1110 MB
>
> show autovacuum_freeze_max_age;
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age
> ---------------------------
> 200000000
> (1 row)
>

You seem to be rather far from the freeze_max_age. Unless you're consuming
txids at a very high rate, I don't think that's your problem.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Teja 2018-01-24 14:48:00 Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
Previous Message pavan95 2018-01-24 11:50:33 Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?