| From: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: adding import in pl/python function |
| Date: | 2013-05-24 19:14:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAGTBQpb=NcXUgF7d4T9TU1GayU0GAOEpPF4e2jDGfPvrV6h=8w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I'm thinking about something else. We could convert it into Decimal
> (http://docs.python.org/2/library/decimal.html) class in Python.
> Unfortunately this class requires import like `from decimal import Decimal`
> from a standard Python library.
>
> I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to do it like this. It shouldn't
> fail even with the trusted version of pl/python, as I'd rather see the
> trusted version to allow importing packages from standard library.
Why would passing a decimal require an import?
The extension itself needs a reference to Decimal, to build them, but
the procedure's context doesn't need to have it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-05-24 19:20:34 | shmem startup and shutdown hooks |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-05-24 19:11:12 | Re: Cost limited statements RFC |