Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values
Date: 2018-03-14 13:56:38
Message-ID: CAGTBQpaKbxUOpbYirs3wCq_0MeL-06k5g8usgbofE25unZRSQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Simon Riggs
<simon(dot)riggs(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> If there is enough delay in step 1 then any benefit is lost anyway, so
> there is no point taking the cached path even when successful, so its
> better to ignore in that case.

I find myself agreeing with that.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-03-14 14:11:01 Re: SQL/JSON: functions
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-03-14 13:51:29 Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values