Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently
Date: 2018-02-05 17:58:00
Message-ID: CAGTBQpZuG-EPoskkFCtBrsztWwHnU8z6VxuPi20axauT+w-aHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> With that in mind, I'm noticing WorkItems have a avw_database that
> isn't checked by do_autovacuum. Is that right? Shouldn't only work
> items that belong to the database being autovacuumed be processed?

NVM. I had to git pull, it's fixed in head.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-02-05 18:03:41 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2018-02-05 17:55:46 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently