From: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: create_unique_path and GEQO |
Date: | 2017-03-24 06:22:11 |
Message-ID: | CAGPqQf3GUeeRa94jfJox9EAK+dF=VKfz7tzooeUEJ=QnzKFToA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <
ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
> In create_unique_path() there's comment
> /*
> * We must ensure path struct and subsidiary data are allocated in main
> * planning context; otherwise GEQO memory management causes trouble.
> */
> oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(root->planner_cxt);
>
> pathnode = makeNode(UniquePath);
>
> This means that when GEQO resets the memory context, the RelOptInfo
> for which this path is created and may be set to cheapest_unique_path
> goes away, the unique path lingers on in the planner context.
> Shouldn't we instead allocate the path in the same context as the
> RelOptInfo similar to mark_dummy_rel()?
>
>
Do you have test case, which can reproduce the issue you
explained above?
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> The Postgres Database Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
--
Rushabh Lathia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-03-24 06:23:11 | Re: Logical decoding on standby |
Previous Message | Kuntal Ghosh | 2017-03-24 06:07:57 | Re: BUG: pg_dump generates corrupted gzip file in Windows |