| From: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wait events for disk I/O |
| Date: | 2017-03-18 17:22:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAGPqQf1Xhf5CjZH1XJNB+AY-_So3f4V_Tk_eqRwdRwhiX1JcRg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Rushabh Lathia
> <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I tried to cover all the suggestion in the attached latest patch.
>
> Committed. I reworded the documentation entries, renamed a few of the
> wait events to make things more consistent, put all three lists in
> rigorous alphabetical order, and I fixed a couple of places where an
> error return from a system call could lead to returning without
> clearing the wait event.
>
>
Thanks Robert.
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
--
Rushabh Lathia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mithun Cy | 2017-03-18 17:29:21 | Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes. |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-03-18 17:18:53 | pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage |