| From: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Gather Merge |
| Date: | 2017-03-10 09:34:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAGPqQf15T0cCCFWWLK8Mj3S=2gMdWwjkj3Bc99DwOQDK77ke9w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
wrote:
> På fredag 10. mars 2017 kl. 10:09:22, skrev Rushabh Lathia <
> rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> The execution-plan seems (unsurprisingly) to depend on data-distribution,
>> so is there a way I can force a GatherMerge?
>>
>
> Not directly. GatherMerge cost is mainly depend on parallel_setup_cost,
> parallel_tuple_cost and cpu_operator_cost. May be you can force this
> by setting this cost low enough. Or another way to force is by disable the
> other plans.
>
> What plan you are getting now? You not seeing the below error ?
>
> ERROR: GatherMerge child's targetlist doesn't match GatherMerge
>
>
> I'm seeing the same error, it's just that for reproducing it I'd rather
> not copy my whole dataset.
>
Can you share me a schema information, I will try to reproduce at my side?
>
> --
> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
>
--
Rushabh Lathia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2017-03-10 10:23:54 | Re: rename pg_log directory? |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-03-10 09:30:20 | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |