From: | Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format |
Date: | 2023-03-15 10:00:54 |
Message-ID: | CAGPVpCSEd6pxN57hi0ma1x22iH7OW7HuuW=P68FHXpBV9xpPvw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Please see v14 [1].
Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, 15 Mar 2023 Çar, 09:22 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
> Here are some review comments for v13-0001
>
> ======
> doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml
>
> 1.
> That's why in the previous v12 review [1] (comment #3) I suggested
> that this page should just say something quite generic like "However,
> replication in binary format is more restrictive", and link back to
> the other page which has all the gory details.
>
You're right. Changed it with what you suggested.
> 2.
> My previous v12 review [1] (comment #6) suggested maybe updating this
> page. But it was not done in v13. Did you accidentally miss the review
> comment, or chose not to do it?
>
Sorry, I missed this. Added a line leading to CREATE SUBSCRIPTION doc.
> ======
> doc/src/sgml/ref/create_subscription.sgml
>
> 3.
> BEFORE
> Binary format is also very data type specific, it will not allow
> copying between different column types as opposed to text format.
>
> SUGGESTION (worded more similar to what is already on the COPY page [2])
> Binary format is very data type specific; for example, it will not
> allow copying from a smallint column to an integer column, even though
> that would work fine in text format.
>
Done.
> 4.
> SUGGESTION
> If the publisher is a <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> version
> before 14, then any initial table synchronization will use text format
> even if <literal>binary = true</literal>.
>
Done.
> SUGGESTION
> If the publisher version is earlier than v14, we use text format COPY.
> Note - In fact COPY syntax "WITH (FORMAT binary)" has existed since
> v9, but since the logical replication binary mode transfer was not
> introduced until v14 it was decided to check using the later version.
>
Changed it as suggested here [2].
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGPVpCTaXYctCUp3z%3D_BstonHiZcC5Jj7584i7B8jeZQq4RJkw%40mail.gmail.com
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2BC7ykvdBxh_t1BdbX5Da1bM1BgsE%3D-i2koPkd3pSid0A%40mail.gmail.com
Thanks,
--
Melih Mutlu
Microsoft
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melih Mutlu | 2023-03-15 10:03:23 | Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format |
Previous Message | Melih Mutlu | 2023-03-15 09:59:50 | Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format |