| From: | Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format |
| Date: | 2023-03-08 12:47:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAGPVpCRr9WjtnUnpEg2fsNHF551=fm4PC+BCTJkge0ggK5bK6Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 7 Mar 2023 Tue at 04:10 Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As per what I could read in this thread, most people prefer to use the
> existing binary option rather than inventing a new way (option) to
> binary copy in the initial sync phase. Do you agree?
I agree.
What do you think about the version checks? I removed any kind of check
since it’s currently a different option. Should we check publisher version
before doing binary copy to ensure that the publisher node supports binary
option of COPY command?
Thanks,
--
Melih Mutlu
Microsoft
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2023-03-08 13:09:29 | Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-03-08 12:34:23 | Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions |