| From: | Oliver Ford <ojford(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | krasiyan(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, david(at)fetter(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options |
| Date: | 2025-03-09 20:07:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAGMVOdvAfKzfjDoA747fGNxYKdXG3rBiqRnwaz=FTcqW1TyOOA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 6:40 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> > Attached version removes the non-nulls array. That seems to speed
> > everything up. Running the above query with 1 million rows averages
> 450ms,
> > similar when using lead/lag.
>
> Great. However, CFbot complains about the patch:
>
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6364194477441024
>
>
Attached fixes the headerscheck locally.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0010-ignore-nulls.patch | application/octet-stream | 47.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2025-03-09 21:30:48 | Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2025-03-09 18:46:15 | Re: Incorrect assert in libpqwalreceiver |