From: | Anthony Bull <antsbull(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jens Wilke <jens(at)wilke(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL reclaiming table space |
Date: | 2012-05-28 11:23:10 |
Message-ID: | CAGK=A1kUMZDi+=rSZj57qjn7y7KuZy=bth9n1761Bd8OED_aJQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I did not run analyze, only vacuum full - the disk usage reported by the OS
has stayed the same also - the data folder under postgres is still at over
25GB. Postgres itself also still reports db size at 25GB, but when I ask
postgres for a table breakdown by size, it reports only about 9GB of tables
in the db.
Will analyze help? I was under the impression that was more for statistics
gathering and index optimising?
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Jens Wilke <jens(at)wilke(dot)org> wrote:
> On Montag, 28. Mai 2012, Anthony Bull wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >This did not
> > work either - postgres still reports 25GB being used by the
> > database.
>
> Did you run analyze?
> Did the disk usage reported by the OS shrink?
>
> Regards, Jens
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasen Betts | 2012-05-28 11:27:16 | Re: PostgreSQL reclaiming table space |
Previous Message | Jens Wilke | 2012-05-28 11:16:37 | Re: PostgreSQL reclaiming table space |