From: | Emanuel Calvo <postgres(dot)arg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | postgresql Forums <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Key not present in table, but it is. |
Date: | 2012-07-11 16:07:40 |
Message-ID: | CAGHEX6a8s1B5MWGpJj00zrcEqWXZspXpns9AK=5nEGcAXFNDnw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2012/7/11 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Emanuel Calvo <postgres(dot)arg(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Executed the following statement:
>> ...
>> ERROR: insert or update on table "veraz" violates foreign key
>> constraint "veraz_dni_fkey"
>> DETAIL: Key (dni)=(21530976) is not present in table "persona".
>
>> But the record is present:
>
>> coches=# select * from dia4.persona where dni = 21530976;
>
> The record is present in a child table of dia4.persona, not dia4.persona
> itself (try "SELECT ... FROM ONLY dia4.persona" to confirm this).
> Foreign key constraints do not look into child tables; see the Caveats
> section at the bottom of
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/ddl-inherit.html
>
> regards, tom lane
Got it. I thought that was happening something like this, didn't
remember about that limitation.
Thanks you once again the help.
--
--
Emanuel Calvo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2012-07-11 19:46:44 | Re: question about installation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-11 15:35:04 | Re: Key not present in table, but it is. |