From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot |
Date: | 2021-07-13 04:30:49 |
Message-ID: | CAGEoWWTq021OZubCjG9m8zLJYEC5sKgzQtbr0fESo0Lh_9bN4A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 6:23 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:28 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 8:39 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have noticed that
> >> a nearby function LogicalIncreaseRestartDecodingForSlot() logs similar
> >> information after releasing spinlock, so it is better to follow the
> >> same here as well.
> >
> >
> > Now that you mention it, the code their looks rather suspicious :)
> > We acquire the spinlock at the beginning of the function but do not
> release it if (restart_lsn <= slot->data.restart_lsn) or if (current_lsn <=
> slot->data.confirmed_flush).
> >
>
> Note that we end else if with (current_lsn <=
> slot->data.confirmed_flush) and after that there is a new if. We
> release lock in both the if/else conditions, so the code is fine as it
> is.
>
Ah! I overlooked the closing else if (). Sorry for the noise.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2021-07-13 04:32:24 | Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-07-13 04:25:06 | Re: Bogus HAVE_DECL_FOO entries in msvc/Solution.pm |