Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Date: 2025-02-22 15:05:14
Message-ID: CAGECzQTk8qAt3dfU7NuEv7nvAH+ckk4M28LFYpxs7W1Za=+eMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 09:51, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> Rebased it, and moved some of the new header definitions around to
> hopefully not have to rebase again.

This required another rebase, but I've decided that I think it'll be
most fruitful to continue the discussion on protocol changes in the
thread about longer cancel keys[1]. Over there I've removed patch 5, 7
and 8 and rebased Heikki's changes on top of the rest. I hope this'll
let us make some progress sooner.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAGECzQTfc_O%2BHXqAo5_-xG4r3EFVsTefUeQzSvhEyyLDba-O9w%40mail.gmail.com#b88eb8989587b1f3acef5c00736b097f

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2025-02-22 15:12:25 Re: Virtual generated columns
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2025-02-22 15:00:01 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning