Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility
Date: 2024-06-12 12:58:04
Message-ID: CAGECzQTJSd+sCYq2m_RcDzp0EUh9226hc6B=Qm_dYpR7UhP45Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 14:44, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> I think since around 6 years ago we have been much more vigilant about
> avoiding ABI breaks. So if there aren't any more recent examples of
> breakage, then maybe that was ultimately successful, and the upshot is,
> continue to be vigilant at about the same level?

While not strictly an ABI break I guess, the backport of 32d5a4974c81
broke building Citus against 13.10 and 14.7[1].

[1]: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6711

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michail Nikolaev 2024-06-12 13:02:43 Re: race condition in pg_class
Previous Message Markus Winand 2024-06-12 12:52:49 Re: ON ERROR in json_query and the like