Re: libpq: Fix lots of discrepancies in PQtrace

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq: Fix lots of discrepancies in PQtrace
Date: 2024-06-26 20:02:08
Message-ID: CAGECzQTJ44hh4UWBKuvmeC7VVGt3vvcG8rKE3YER=aODXxR_JA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 18:36, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Thanks, Nathan. I'm holding myself responsible for the rest ... will
> handle soon after the branch.

Sounds great. Out of curiosity, what is the backpatching policy for
something like this? Honestly most of these patches could be
considered bugfixes in PQtrace, so backpatching might make sense. OTOH
I don't think PQtrace is used very much in practice, so backpatching
might carry more risk than it's worth.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-06-26 20:19:01 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-06-26 20:01:47 Re: JIT causes core dump during error recovery