From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema |
Date: | 2024-06-19 17:50:09 |
Message-ID: | CAGECzQSyznMQCPtrxn0FcnR3gS1pirt--Gw28to22Q+QMvDSVg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 17:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> But I wonder if there might also be another possible approach: could
> we, somehow, prevent object references in extension scripts from
> resolving to anything other than the system catalogs and the contents
> of that extension?
This indeed does sound like the behaviour that pretty much every
existing extension wants to have. One small addition/clarification
that I would make to your definition: fully qualified references to
other objects should still be allowed.
I do think, even if we have this, there would be other good reasons to
use "owned schemas" for extension authors. At least the following two:
1. To have a safe search_path that can be used in SET search_path on a
function (see also [1]).
2. To make it easy for extension authors to avoid conflicts with other
extensions/UDFs.
> Perhaps with a control file setting to specify a
> list of trusted extensions which we're also allowed to reference?
I think we could simply use the already existing "requires" field from
the control file. i.e. you're allowed to reference only your own
extension
> I have a feeling that this might be pretty annoying to implement, and
> if that is true, then never mind.
Based on a quick look it's not trivial, but also not super bad.
Basically it seems like in src/backend/catalog/namespace.c, every time
we loop over activeSearchPath and CurrentExtensionObject is set, then
we should skip any item that's not stored in pg_catalog, unless
there's a DEPENDENCY_EXTENSION pg_depend entry for the item (and that
pg_depend entry references the extension or the requires list).
There's quite a few loops over activeSearchPath in namespace.c, but
they all seem pretty similar. So while a bunch of code would need to
be changed, the changes could probably be well encapsulated in a
function.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-06-19 17:55:44 | Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema |
Previous Message | Wolfgang Walther | 2024-06-19 17:49:53 | Docs: Order of json aggregate functions |