Re: Small LO_BUFSIZE slows down lo_import and lo_export in libpq

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Дмитрий Питаков <dvpitakov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small LO_BUFSIZE slows down lo_import and lo_export in libpq
Date: 2024-06-21 12:07:21
Message-ID: CAGECzQSdUevo7NrbNvnfrxukfXShJPS-BA+7cuQ-OMcCpz0D=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 10:46, Дмитрий Питаков <dvpitakov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Why not increase the buffer size?

I think changing the buffer size sounds like a reasonable idea, if
that speeds stuff up. But I think it would greatly help your case if
you showed the perf increase using a simple benchmark, especially if
people could run this benchmark on their own machines to reproduce.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2024-06-21 12:18:15 Re: SQL/JSON query functions context_item doc entry and type requirement
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-06-21 11:55:51 Re: Custom TupleTableSlotOps while Initializing Custom Scan