From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
Date: | 2023-12-29 23:49:40 |
Message-ID: | CAGECzQSY=NFYSCu1fktSkcBSR9Aiv3vEVBmOoRJtUbVhbFq5kw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 19:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > 2. It paves the way for GUCs that can only be set using a protocol
> > message (and not using SET).
>
> This is assuming facts not in evidence.
How about instead of talking about protocol-only GUCs (which are
indeed currently a theoretical concept), we start considering this
patch as a way to modify parameters for protocol extensions. Protocol
extension parameters (starting with _pq_.) can currently only be
configured using the StartupMessage and afterwards there is no way to
modify them.
I believe [1], [2] and [3] from my initial email could all use such
protocol extension parameters, if those parameters could be changed
after the initial startup.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-12-30 11:11:59 | Re: backtrace_on_internal_error |
Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2023-12-29 23:31:36 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |