From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
Date: | 2024-04-05 16:48:38 |
Message-ID: | CAGECzQSVR+HtxxJSLyDM8hrnXJhq3f-DaiN7SG3yeaavA0PiJw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 18:30, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > I really intended the _pq_ prefix as a way of taking something out of
>> > the GUC namespace, not as a part of the GUC namespace that users would
>> > see. And I'm reluctant to go back on that. If we want to make
>> > pg_protocol.${NAME} mean a wire protocol parameter, well maybe there's
>> > something to that idea [insert caveats here]. But doesn't _pq_ look
>> > like something that was intended to be internal? That's certainly how
>> > I intended it.
>
>
> Is this actually used in practice? If so, how ?
No, it's not used for anything at the moment. This whole thread is
basically about trying to agree on how we want to make protocol
changes in the future in a somewhat standardized way. But using the
tools available that we have to not break connecting to old postgres
servers: ProtocolVersionNegotation messages, minor version numbers,
and _pq_ parameters in the startup message. All of those have so far
been completely theoretical and have not appeared in any client-server
communication.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2024-04-05 16:54:46 | Re: Fixing backslash dot for COPY FROM...CSV |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-04-05 16:48:14 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |