Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Denis Laxalde <denis(dot)laxalde(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema <Jelte(dot)Fennema(at)microsoft(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel
Date: 2024-01-26 23:14:58
Message-ID: CAGECzQSTxGtMO=S=OCv1HX7AvB+bXUMQmB=Sb6y8HVSRTPbfFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 18:19, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Yeah, I see that point of view as well. I like the end result; the
> additional protos in libpq-int.h don't bother me. Does anybody else
> wants to share their opinion on it? If none, then I'd consider going
> ahead with this version.

To be clear, I'm +1 on the new file structure (although if people feel
strongly against it, I don't care enough to make a big deal out of
it).

@Alvaro did you have any other comments on the contents of the patch btw?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2024-01-26 23:24:28 Re: Bug: The "directory" control parameter does not work
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-01-26 23:04:28 Re: proposal: psql: show current user in prompt