From: | Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: psql: show current user in prompt |
Date: | 2023-09-11 11:23:54 |
Message-ID: | CAGECzQSD11wX7vNZw1ZapxLQrg3HW8pOWmNueRYZQkWyUvp61Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 21:08, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ok changed - there is minor problem - almost all PQ functions are of int type, but ProtocolVersion is uint
Your current implementation requires using the PG_PROTOCOL macros to
compare versions. But clients cannot currently use those macros since
they are not exported from libpq-fe.h, only from pqcomm.h which is
then imported by libpq-int.h. (psql/command.c imports pcomm.h
directly, but I don't think we should expect clients to do that). We
could ofcourse export these macros from libpq-fe.h too. But then we'd
need to document those macros too.
> Using different mapping to int can be problematic - can be messy if we cannot use PG_PROTOCOL macro.
I see no big problems returning an unsigned or long from the new
function (even if existing functions all returned int). But I don't
even think that is necessary. Returning the following as an int from
PQprotocolVersionFull would work fine afaict:
return PG_PROTOCOL_MAJOR(version) * 1000 + PG_PROTOCOL_MINOR(version)
This would give us one thousand minor versions for each major version.
This seems fine for all practical purposes. Since postgres only
releases a version once every year, we'd need a protocol bump every
year for one thousand years for that to ever cause any problems. So
I'd prefer this approach over making the PG_PROTOCOL macros a public
interface.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2023-09-11 11:49:27 | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
Previous Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2023-09-11 11:03:13 | Re: Build the docs if there are changes in docs and don't run other tasks if the changes are only in docs |