Re: Partial aggregates pushdown

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: "Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp" <Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)mitsubishielectric(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Date: 2024-08-08 11:48:49
Message-ID: CAGECzQSB-Y=WGe4bGA7+cxLTrkuz8t_x+kpgJS+NP4mP0gVSFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

SUMMARY OF THREAD

The design of patch 0001 is agreed upon by everyone on the thread (so
far). This adds the PARTIAL_AGGREGATE label for aggregates, which will
cause the finalfunc not to run. It also starts using PARTIAL_AGGREGATE
for pushdown of aggregates in postgres_fdw. In 0001 PARTIAL_AGGREGATE
is only supported for aggregates with a non-internal/pseudo type as
the stype.

The design for patch 0002 is still under debate. This would expand on
the functionality added by adding support for PARTIAL_AGGREGATE for
aggregates with an internal stype. This is done by returning a byte
array containing the bytes that the serialfunc of the aggregate
returns.

A competing proposal for 0002 is to instead change aggregates to not
use an internal stype anymore, and create dedicated types. The main
downside here is that infunc and outfunc would need to be added for
text serialization, in addition to the binary serialization. An open
question is: Can we change the requirements for CREATE TYPE, so that
types can be created without infunc and outfunc.

WHAT IS NEEDED?

The things needed for this patch are that docs need to be added, and
detailed codereview needs to be done.

Feedback from more people on the two competing proposals for 0002
would be very helpful in making a decision.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2024-08-08 12:15:42 Re: CREATE DATABASE with filesystem cloning
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-08-08 11:39:37 Re: Windows default locale vs initdb