Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Date: 2024-04-08 10:42:23
Message-ID: CAGECzQRy1DBTkhKgnoFcep5JNk-eGt71Dtf_axc1ihGzXnakFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 14:41, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Looking at the code in socket_putmessage_noblock(), I don't understand
> why it's ok for PqSendBufferSize to be int but "required" must be
> size_t. There's a line that does "PqSendBufferSize = required;". It
> kinda looks like they both should be size_t. Am I missing something
> that you've thought about?

You and Ranier are totally right (I missed this assignment). Attached is v8.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Make-a-few-variables-size_t-in-pqcomm.c.patch application/octet-stream 1.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tender Wang 2024-04-08 10:43:51 Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-04-08 10:31:41 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby