Re: Correct documentation for protocol version

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct documentation for protocol version
Date: 2025-04-11 15:02:27
Message-ID: CAGECzQRheOWeX2gZQaNTXouU40iQBizUdaceODTjE5xj4+-HtQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 22:57, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well this isn't quite true since if you request 3.0 and have invalid options it will return 3.0, which is not the highest supported minor version.

Probably good to update this section too then to be similarly correct
as your already updated section. Maybe also good to clarify further
that the version that the server responds with is the protocol version
that will be used during the following communication.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-04-11 15:32:30 Re: disallow ALTER VIEW SET DEFAULT when the corresponding base relation column is a generated column
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2025-04-11 15:01:31 Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart