| From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
| Date: | 2024-08-20 15:53:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQR_9qc5MVq1jPHO9nAe+byCaw7vN8PfKpNk3Q1LH8wTtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 17:46, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I personally like this less than both (a) adding a new function and
> (b) redefining the existing function as Jelte proposes. It just seems
> too clever to me.
Agreed, I'm not really seeing a benefit of returning 4 instead of
30004. Both are new numbers that are higher than 3, so on existing
code they would have the same impact. But any new code would be more
readable when using version >= 30004 imho.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-08-20 16:02:34 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-08-20 15:45:58 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |