| From: | Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jelte Fennema <Jelte(dot)Fennema(at)microsoft(dot)com>, "isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com" <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] Support using "all" for the db user in pg_ident.conf |
| Date: | 2023-02-13 14:13:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQRXzWF8GzCOqUWb0qiRn+hxNF1BQEwSVvrUMeVLhOPo6g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 15:06, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Does it make sense to reflect changes to the PG-USERNAME field in the
> pg_ident.conf.sample file?
>
> The same relates to the regexp supportin the DATABASE and USER fieldsof
> the pg_hba.conf.sample file(8fea8683).
That definitely makes sense to me. When writing the patch I didn't
realise that there was also documentation in those files.
I think it also makes sense to include usage of (some of) the features
in the example files here:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/auth-username-maps.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tender wang | 2023-02-13 14:32:32 | ERROR: permission info at index 1 .... |
| Previous Message | Pavel Luzanov | 2023-02-13 14:06:02 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] Support using "all" for the db user in pg_ident.conf |