From: | Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format |
Date: | 2023-02-28 13:25:11 |
Message-ID: | CAGECzQQvh=UO--Vgdz=yT2aNLJ79wLUP+wUy7vLsAktVmZ1QaQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 3. I think the newly added tests must verify if the binary COPY is
> picked up when enabled. Perhaps, looking at the publisher's server log
> for 'COPY ... WITH BINARY format'? Maybe it's an overkill, otherwise,
> we have no way of testing that the option took effect.
Another way to test that BINARY is enabled could be to trigger one
of the failure cases.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-02-28 13:37:02 | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-02-28 13:20:17 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |