Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format

From: Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Date: 2023-02-28 13:25:11
Message-ID: CAGECzQQvh=UO--Vgdz=yT2aNLJ79wLUP+wUy7vLsAktVmZ1QaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 3. I think the newly added tests must verify if the binary COPY is
> picked up when enabled. Perhaps, looking at the publisher's server log
> for 'COPY ... WITH BINARY format'? Maybe it's an overkill, otherwise,
> we have no way of testing that the option took effect.

Another way to test that BINARY is enabled could be to trigger one
of the failure cases.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-02-28 13:37:02 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-02-28 13:20:17 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum