| From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: format_datum debugging function |
| Date: | 2024-08-12 21:30:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQQhtGsQSkBKGX7JC2QS7woVPM=PcOTO2yC49rOZFah1NA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 23:15, Paul Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/12/24 04:32, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> >> (gdb) call format_datum(range_out, $1)
> >> $2 = 0x59162692d938 "[1,4)"
> >>
> >> I assume a patch like this doesn't need documentation. Does it need a test? Anything else?
> >
> > I think you forgot to attach the patch. Or is it just a proposal?
>
> Sorry, patch attached here.
+1 for the idea. And the code looks trivial enough. I think this
should also contain a print_datum function too though.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-08-12 21:32:45 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-08-12 21:26:02 | Re: Returning from a rule with extended query protocol |