| From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Detailed release notes |
| Date: | 2024-09-18 11:46:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQQBEvSX8Ek027NWstf1iKrWyTfjm2TO8rOzX5xpa-6swg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 18 Sept 2024 at 13:38, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
>> Maybe this shouldn't be done between RC1 and GA. This is clearly a more
>> complex topic that should go through a proper review and testing cycle.
>
> I think this is just a question of decision, not reviewing or testing.
> And I'm sure there will be more people reading Release Notes now, in September and October, than in January or April.
+1. Also, IMHO the links even in their current simple form of "§ § §
§" are a huge net-positive on the release notes. So yes, I'm sure we
can format them more clearly with some bikeshedding, but removing them
completely seems like an overreaction to me.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-09-18 12:10:10 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
| Previous Message | Marcos Pegoraro | 2024-09-18 11:37:38 | Re: Detailed release notes |