From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(dot)hagander(at)redpill-linpro(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
Date: | 2024-03-25 20:40:55 |
Message-ID: | CAGECzQQ5CaNo=JnL5_sxFCmyV8_76A9L7X-hRQYzhGLpJYzt4Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 20:16, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I am wondering if the fact that you would be able to do:
>
> ALTER SYSTEM SET externally_managed_configuration = false
>
> and then be unable to use ALTER SYSTEM to revert the change is
> significant.
This is not possible, due to the externally_managed_configuration GUC
having the GUC_DISALLOW_IN_AUTO_FILE flag.
> Isn't "configuration" too generic a term for disabling ALTER SYSTEM?
maybe "externally_managed_auto_config"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-03-25 20:44:03 | Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2024-03-25 20:33:16 | Re: Why is parula failing? |