Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements
Date: 2025-03-07 10:49:23
Message-ID: CAGECzQQ-hg4P-Oq+4-027dEsUNB6MqSU2aNAkBcbHTaiYSY-KQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 11:26, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> Out of curiosity: do you track which method works? I would expect
> everything to be applied with either git am or patch which can be
> applied with git apply making git apply technically unnecessary.

I think we need all of them...
- git apply is unable to apply the patch in 5272 on top of main
- git am, works with that 5272, but cannot apply any patch not created
by git format-patch (for instance 5522)
- I've been unable to get patch(1) not to return a failure if the
patch is already applied. So applying e.g. 5522 twice. git apply
handles that fine.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-03-07 10:52:09 Re: meson vs. llvm bitcode files
Previous Message Vladlen Popolitov 2025-03-07 10:43:54 Re: PoC. The saving of the compiled jit-code in the plan cache