Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?

From: Shreeyansh Dba <shreeyansh2014(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: rajan <vgmonnet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?
Date: 2019-01-03 06:24:12
Message-ID: CAGDYbUMByo4Wp22tyBbf06gOqMHp7JtVFaEggzB67oMZ+cCtSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi Rajan,

Can you confirm which tool are you talking about?

Usually, we seen monitoring tools depend on the connection parameters, it
internally uses PostgreSQL background process.

Thanks & Regards,
*Shreeyansh DBA Team*
www.shreeyansh.com

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 10:18 AM rajan <vgmonnet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Ok. Let me explain my use case from where I am asking this question,
>
> For configuring Postgres Monitoring using a tool,
> Is it enough if I just add the Postmaster process alone for Monitoring? or
> Should I add all background processes for Monitoring?
>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Thanks,
> Rajan.
> --
> Sent from:
> http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rajan 2019-01-03 08:43:26 Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?
Previous Message rajan 2019-01-03 04:47:54 Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?